At the core of her critique is the issue of land ownership. Michèle Oriol described the way this topic is handled in the draft as "irresponsible." She argued that the right of first refusal mentioned in the document has no place in a constitutional text but should instead be governed by specific urban planning laws, particularly within the framework of land readjustment. According to the sociologist, this provision reveals a lack of understanding of land mechanisms and risks creating confusion and conflict.
On the
Si vous avez déjà créé un compte, connectez-vous pour lire la suite de cet article. Pas encore de compte ? Inscrivez-vous
